Read dangerous milo online download torrent

Necessary disclaimers here: I don't hate Milo; I feel fairly ambivalently towards him, much the way I feel about particular species of slugs, or about tapioca pudding. I have mixed feelings about issues such as no-platforming; I think it can be both a tool for good and for censorship, depending entirely on the context and the reason. My main problem with Milo's book is not simply that he's right-wing; it's that he doesn't seem to genuinely believe anything he says.

I would look upon Milo differe Necessary disclaimers here: I don't hate Milo; I feel fairly ambivalently towards him, much the way I feel about particular species of slugs, or about tapioca pudding. I would look upon Milo differently if I thought he were slightly more authentic than the homepage of Fashion Nova.

I generally believe it's important to expose yourself to different ideas, even if the end result is just to reiterate why you disagree with them, so the existence of a book which I fundamentally disagree with isn't the issue here. I try to read books that I disagree with fairly regularly in order to better understand, challenge and affirm my own views. The issue is that I think he's hoodwinked people, and I find it very hard to respect that. There's two things I agree with Milo on.

I would rather know what he has to say than not; how else can I be sure that it's all tripe? Spoiler: it is. The second thing that we agree on is that respiration is necessary for life.

At least, I assume that we agree on that. I have no idea. Maybe we don't. Maybe Milo would say that's fake news, or Leftist propaganda, or doesn't apply to Muslims. Anyway, this book is not a manifesto. It is a twatifesto. It is page after page of nonsense claims, either unverified and lacking any kind of citation, or backed up with citations to his own website or other right wing thinkpieces. It can be summed up fairly succinctly as follows: 'I'm really hot', 'here is an unverified statement that I'm going to present as an objective, unbiased fact', 'here is a citation from my own website', 'feminists are ugly and never do the sex thing', 'I'm gay and do the sex thing all the time', and 'I say things just to be controversial, because meaning things is for feminists'.

Yes, in one chapter Milo admits that he doesn't actually believe most of what he says, but says it anyway because he enjoys being 'taboo'. Tip top, Milo. No-one's ever been taboo before. Truly transgressive. And when I say that our Milo is taboo and transgressive, hoo boy! You don't even know the half of it. It's like he's never even heard of Queer theory!

Now that's transgressive; doing something to piss off an entire group of people and accidentally ending up affirming their entire way of doing things.

You having the right to call yourself a term of your own choosing even if others find it derogatory is, in fact, exactly what those dang Lefties want. You want to really get those 'Lefties' all het up?

Call yourself a Centrist. That'll do it. Perhaps that's being a little mean. After all, Milo really does dive deep into some pretty hefty topics in this weighty work of political nous.

Some of the great philosophical questions tackled and, I think you'll agree, answered in this magnum opus include: - are feminists lying about rape statistics and inflating them to demonise men, or are rape statistics actually incredibly high because of Muslim migration?

Well, both, according to Milo. Feminists lie about rape statistics and rape culture doesn't exist, because feminists are all ugly lesbians with cats and they hate men and want them to suffer, and no-one would want to rape them anyway. But also, mass migration of Muslims to the West is causing enormous levels of rape, sometimes organised and planned in advance by groups of Muslim men as a sort of war tactic in order to take over the West through degrading their women.

It's Schrodinger's rape, at once a lie when Milo wants to demonise feminists, and an objective fact when he wants to demonise Muslims. And yet Milo says that feminists are the ones who politicise rape! When Milo's followers send pictures of gorillas to black actresses and post the addresses of prominent feminists online, it's fine, because they have the right to do it, and it's not like it's serious! God, just get over it, guys.

Unless you're doing it to a Nazi, in which case you're a disgusting SJW who needs to get off the Internet and have some sex, or something. It's the Left who accuse the Right of fake news, because they can't stand the truth that the media outlets of the Right convey, like how Trump didn't mean he actually grabbed women by the pussy, even though he said he grabbed women by the pussy, and so the Left dub it 'fake news' to try and discredit it, and therefore to attempt to discredit the moral, honest Right in general.

But also, when the Right call the Left's output 'fake news', that's accurate because the Left writes about Trump in a bad way, which makes it fake. But when the Left say 'fake news', it's wrong, and they made up the term. But the Right can use it. It's all very confusing when you try and parse out the hypocrisy of it all, but essentially, 'fake news' just means 'things that Milo doesn't agree with', which is, of course, the viewpoint of a reasoned intellectual.

Well, both, according to Milo have you noticed the pattern here yet? When the alt-right send Nazi rhetoric or photos of swastikas to Jewish people, they're just trolling, and it's an expression of their anger at the status quo, which makes them feel ignored and downtrodden.

But also, says Milo, the alt-right movement has been ambushed by Nazis. But they're not all Nazis, Milo says, except for the ones who are. Who are the Nazis, you ask? Who knows. They're there, somewhere, except for when they're not, except for when they are, which they're not. Unless they are, of course. Says Milo. Milo has marketed this book as being too dangerous for commercial publication.

It's just too degenerate for the masses, he says. He tells truths that people don't want to hear, he says. The dull truth is that this book is dangerous on only two levels, and it's not for the reasons Milo claims.

Firstly, the entire reason it was dropped and ultimately self published cannot be limited to 'Milo said things about young boys which was too controversial', even if that's the main line that the press coverage of the book has taken. There are clearly other factors at play here, even beyond the genuinely abysmal writing style which, by-the-by, reads very much like the secret Reddit history of a 15 year old boy who still thinks that the word 'butt' is the pinnacle of comedy , and these more serious issues of publication become clear when you read the text.

Which I did. All of it. Every single awful page. Many claims he makes here about specific individuals, several of whom are named, are either patently inaccurate or open to dispute, and unverified, and the few claims which are cited use websites like Breitbart or, hilariously, Milo's own tweets. The other primary issue with this book is quite simply that the worldwide supply of anti-nausea drugs could never meet the demand, should this book have been allowed to obtain any semblance of a real audience.

There's really only so many times one can read a variation on 'I'm hot and like to fuck Imagine the world health crisis. What if we all cut ourselves on all the edge? What then, Milo? Have you thought about the edge?! And listen, in all seriousness, I don't think that Milo is evil. I really, genuinely don't.

The validation that Milo seeks, however, is not validation that he is right, or even that he makes sense - he seeks assurance that yes, he is controversial, and yes, he's super duper edgy and taboo, and yes, he makes people angry. He takes people's rage at his poorly researched, inflammatory statements, and he turns it into his armour.

It protects him, because if people attack what he says, which by his own admission is not a reflection of his own thought, then they are not attacking him. His ostentatiousness, his courting of controversy, his pseudo-polemicist rants - these protect him. He craves attention because it is diverting. Look at Milo the persona, the public figure, and not at the person, the man behind it all.

There is probably a truly hideous self-portrait in his attic which is feeding off his soul as we speak. Milo makes a carapace of this artifice and hides himself within it, because it's the only way he knows to evade real criticism. Milo is not brave; he's afraid, and this book is not the work of a bold, silenced voice who only wants to speak the truth; it is the work of a man terrified to be authentically perceived, a man who shouts loudly about being silenced because he's afraid that no-one will listen to what he actually wants to say, which is 'please, dear God, won't someone just like me.

It reads more as a man trying to convince himself of the arguments that he's making than anything else. I support freedom of speech. I'm glad that we live in a world where we're able to speak openly about what we believe.

That said, I support freedom of speech primarily when people have something to say, and honestly, Milo doesn't, and he doesn't even say it - or hide it - well.

Aug 06, John Anthony rated it really liked it. Why the Progressive Left Hates Me. Why the Alt-Right Hates Me. Why Twitter Hates Me. Why Feminists Hate Me. Why the Media Hates Me 7. Why Establishment Gays Hate Me.

Why Establishment Republicans Hate Me. Why Muslims Hate Me. Acknowledgements Endnotes As you might gather from the above, Milo is never lost for words, whereas Yours Truly is grappling to find the right ones to respond to this. Anyway, here goes…. He uses these tactics to get his serious points across and he succeeds.

He ought then to be virtually untouchable, surely? Sexually abused by a priest when he was 13 he says he wanted what the priest was offering him and has no intention of whining and making a living from it. View all 6 comments. Educates and entertains The British are coming! The British are coming! No, it's just one Brit, and that Brit is the self-proclaimed Dangerous faggot and provocateur, Milo Yiannopoulos.

Needless to say, I loved this book! Milo educates and entertains at the same. No one does it better. At a crucial time in our nation's history when the first amendment is under attack, this is the man who will lead the charge to defend this precious right.

Get out of your comfort zones America, stop your whining a Educates and entertains The British are coming! Get out of your comfort zones America, stop your whining and sniveling. The time has come to open your minds and lose your identity politics. Milo is going to meet you at the threshold of your safe spaces.

Love him or hate him. Ready or not. Here he comes! Jan 15, Scott rated it it was ok. I was just curious. But yeah, no. What's sad here is that I don't disagree with Milo entirely all the time. The core of his stance in this book is, I think, a solid one. I too am dismayed at the level of discourse among the Left in recent years, particularly on the topics of gender, sexuality, and religious extremism.

So there are portions of this book where it is easy to say "Yeah, I get you" but when you stop to really examine his stance, it becomes clear that he doesn't get it at all. Milo take I was just curious. Milo takes pride in being a self-proclaimed provocateur, which is problematic in itself.

In order to be one, you basically have to relinquish all subtlety. You may be starting a conversation, but you're not primed to participate in it. That paired with his complete inability to self-examine completely compromises his entire message, whether right or not.

Instead of being the mouthpiece of a movement, he's just an open mouth. I don't predict that the future will remember the Thing Milo Did in any appreciable way. What he does here is come after low-hanging fruit.

It's easy to say that feminism has lost its message or the mainstream media is full of shit and even provide reasons why you think this is true, but he offers nothing at all in return.

And the biggest weakness here is that -- on a general level -- though he comes for the Left, he never says why the Right is any better. Milo is clearly unable to apply his level of scrutiny to his own ideas and those of the people he supports. While calling out the blindness and hypocrisy of whole groups of people, he turns around and supports groups guilty of the same fallacious logical and dialectical bullshit he claims to be so against.

Though he name drops enough people to suggest that he is considered and rational, his words reek of the same obnoxious factionalism he hates. If he'd shut his mouth and really take the stronger logical threads here to their conclusions, I think he'd make an excellent skeptic.

It's sort of a shame. So let's be real here: There are no original ideas in this book. Everything he says has and is being engaged with at a much more meaningful level elsewhere. I'd much rather turn to the cultural theorists, political thinkers, and skeptical community for these topics rather than some masturbatory exercise in self-aggrandizement by a man who is intelligent, but not spectacularly so.

So while I don't think Milo is a white supremacist or a Nazi or a self-hating gay, and I do even have some respect for his mobilization of youth on his college tour, I don't think his ideas or this book is any good.

Nor could I be friends with someone who is so unaware that he's not funny. Man, is he not funny. You don't have to be! Not being funny is as unjudged a quality as attached earlobes, nobody cares. But unfunny people who think they're funny are the fucking worst. So we're not going to be friends. I'm sure he's devastated. Lastly, if I may go shallow for a minute: Bitch, you'd better watch yourself calling out fat and ugly people while prattling on about how pretty you are.

You're getting doughy in the face yourself. And from one doughy gay boy to another, I need to remind you to look at some photos of yourself that haven't been beaten to death by Photoshop. That jawline is fake news, and at best, you're a Nightclub 8, Daylight 7. A solid B. And that's great! Disclaimer: I am a Nightclub 7, Daylight 6. View all 4 comments.

Jul 09, W. Love him or hate him, Milo entertains with a sharp wit. His book mirrors his bullet-stream approach to political messaging. It's a biting commentary, but it does deliver key talking points that are quite on target.

Behind his usual bombastic imaging there is clear analytical and intelligent reasoning. His focus includes how culture, entertainment, politics, and information are constantly intertwined and evolving.

The book had me thinking, which makes it a success. Sep 03, Bilbo Baggins rated it it was amazing. Hilarious, politically incorrect, truthful, dangerous and really hilarious. I would recommend to all ;. Jul 12, Leo Robertson rated it liked it. I've been in a reading slump and this of all things is what I managed to read to the end of, ahaha. I don't think anyone that follows my reviews will really be bothered that I read this.

If you are, I read over books a year plus as many short stories and articles online—it's not that big a deal. And there will be, I'm pretty sure, more articles written about this book on large media sites than people who have actually read this book, so I thought you might want some info on it. I would've lov I've been in a reading slump and this of all things is what I managed to read to the end of, ahaha. I would've loved to dismiss him on the basis that he creates controversy for controversy's sake—the THREE introductions to this book didn't do much help ahaha—but he has thought about stuff and reached conclusions or collected and collated stuff other people have thought —whether or not you agree with what those conclusions are is another thing.

He goes through his stances on the various issues on which he's spoken about in colleges and such: GamerGate, feminism, Islam, gay marriage, fatness. No climate change though: guess it wasn't fabulous enough.

I don't agree with most of it, but that's not the point of reading, uh, anything. Even Yiannopoulos in his YouTube videos advises people to listen to him and to those on the left and make their own decisions. Plus you can strengthen your own opinions if you do in fact disagree. For example, just because gay people were once part of a counterculture, doesn't mean those of them that want to get married shouldn't. I didn't know people were using that argument against gay marriage. Now I do, and I gained an "others think Because of the dead chickens in the cupboard thing?

Don't Google it. This book is probably a gateway to Ben Shapiro's Bullies, which I'm also interested in reading, though it didn't seem as accessibly written. Because I appreciate Shapiro's views for the most part.

It isn't fair that there's a prevailing liberal bias in American media. You need both wings to fly. Can't if they're lopsided and not in communication. Even although, again, I don't agree with most of his views, and also the guy doesn't believe in climate change. Though if he's willing to overlook my sin of homosexuality, I guess I can hear him out on other stances. Yiannopoulos himself knows that his book's title only succeeds if you freak the eff out.

View all 7 comments. Jul 03, Marianne rated it it was amazing. So after waiting long enough it has finally been released. Dangerous is very much what should be expected from Milo with his usual blend of humour and information. Milo's usual writing style is equally effective in a longer format as it is in a shorter format.

Dangerous is divided into topic specific chapters making the book easy to read and understand. If you don't like Milo read the book because you may come to understand why he has been successful and why Trump succeeded.

If you like Milo you So after waiting long enough it has finally been released. If you like Milo you're probably going to read it anyway so I don't need to give you a reason to read it. Either way you will learn something new. Jul 06, Karen A. Wyle rated it liked it. This book's voice fluctuates frequently between Milo's troll persona and a straightforward, earnest, serious description of lamentable cultural trends and the need to push back against them.

It's fairly repetitive and could probably have been a bit shorter with tighter editing. The very impressive wit Milo displays in interviews and appearances is somewhat less noticeable here. I hope the book has some wider impact than preaching to preening for, parading before the choir. View all 5 comments. Sep 21, John Wiltshire rated it it was amazing.

I'm taking Milo to bed every night now. I suspect, from following him for a while, that I wouldn't be his prefered bed partner. I've always been pale true Anglo-Saxon here but after recent summers at the butt-end of the world where icebergs float past in this ocean laughingly and deceptively called the Pacific I still maintain the bit I look out on is actually the Southern Ocean, which, therefore, more accurately conjures up images of Shakleton and other hideous feats of chilly derring-do , I I'm taking Milo to bed every night now.

I've always been pale true Anglo-Saxon here but after recent summers at the butt-end of the world where icebergs float past in this ocean laughingly and deceptively called the Pacific I still maintain the bit I look out on is actually the Southern Ocean, which, therefore, more accurately conjures up images of Shakleton and other hideous feats of chilly derring-do , I am now, as Billy Connelly once put it, almost blue.

But other than that, we're pretty good bed companions. He has a neat line in pillow talk. Yes, I've heard it all before in his many, many YouTube appearances. But you can't have too much of Milo Yiannopoulos, I've decided.

He's not to everyone's taste, sure. Leslie Jones definitely wasn't too keen at one point, so I hear. But if you value irreverence, understand satire, like to laugh at other people but mostly at yourself, then this is a great book. That it's also intellectual, thought-provoking, and pretty much essential reading for those of us regretting the seemingly inevitable end of our current civilization, is surprising.

I'm not a huge non-fiction fan way too much intellectual effort , but this is nuanced, well researched and referenced. If you see a Google Drive link instead of source url, means that the file witch you will get after approval is just a summary of original book or the file has been already removed. Loved each and every part of this book. I will definitely recommend this book to politics, non fiction lovers.

Your Rating:. Your Comment:. Home Downloads Free Downloads Dangerous pdf. Read Online Download. Dangerous Audiobook Free. However already I am seeing the seeds of conventional disobedience in their little teenaged selves. I learned about Milo prior to he was popular. My kid that invests lots of time on the net informed me concerning him. My son becomes part of the silent conservative rebellion brewing amongst youths in our nation. He is extremely silent regarding his views due to the fact that also in a really conservative state any type of Trump support or preservation is just not appropriate in public.

My state, Utah, went Trump in spite of every quit being pulled out to prevent his political election. I did not know a single open Trump supporter, all of us were underground, and consequently several were surprised he got as many ballots as he did despite the entire Evan McMullin mess. Over and over I would certainly hear people state they did not know anyone that elected Trump because anybody who at any kind of point articulated public support would certainly be casigated.

One of the most diehard Trump advocate I understand is an illegal Guatemalan. She informed me She did not desire the USA to become what she left even if she obtained deported and also needed to go back.